Register Login Contact Us

Spock personality type Seeking Private Man

Sex Married Wanting Serious Relationship Cute Red Headed Bbw Seeking Ltr With Free Milf Finder Bear


Spock personality type

Online: Now

About

Im good waiting, with good surprice. One good wan waiting for long term relationship,I'm fifty. If your thick hmu two 4921. I'm caucasian, 5 feet 9 inches, nice looking, with short black hair.

Celestia
Age: 36
Relationship Status: Newlyweds
Seeking: Seeking Real Nsa
City: Butler County
Hair: Dishevelled waves
Relation Type: Lonely Local Women Ready Sluty Girls

Views: 2587

submit to reddit

It is quite silly study leadership as just a well to serve; many leaders pursue power, some are able to do good things with it, others are swallowed by power. Nietzsche wrote about Will-to-Power WTP and Thus Spoke Zarathustra TSZ as having something to do with the will to initiate and implement a goal as well as the more macro construct of Darwin's theory of natural section, the power to transform the inherited advantages from generation to generation WTP And the superleader is not satisfied with the happiness of the greatest of workers or consumers TSZ, p.

The Super leaders sees the abyss with the eyes of an eagle and grasps the abyss of poverty and misery with the talons of an eagle TSZ, p. Are you more about will-to-serve or will-to-power in your leader personality, style and the organization situation you lead? Some leaders cultivate one voice, their own, and others are more pluralistic, able to create polyphonic leadership.

First - there was one voice -In bureaucratic theater, there is mostly monologue. In bureaucratic leadership, for example, there is mostly monologue; other voices are there on the stage but forbidden to speak, or they can only be whispered, their words unhearable, drowned out by the one official narrator who is authorized to take center-stage and speak and speak some more. As Kirkeby argues it is the right of power to narrate events, to declare them romantic, tragic, comedic, or ironic, and then of course make them all into a romantic narratives that fits the bureaucratic pension for monophonic single voiced influence.

For any other voice to speak would be an act of bureaucratic espionage; certainly for the secretary to speak would be unthinkable rebellion. Second - there were two voices - In the Quest two or more players take the stage, but it is rarely more than dialog. In dialogue the "I" and the "Other" take the stage and we hear voices, but little reflection.

It is no longer the monologue of the I declaring the Other as villain. The Other gets to speak and be heard by the 'I. Third - there were three voices - To me, this voice that Kirkeby describes is the same one discovered long ago by Adam Smith. Smith looked at global capitalism and say that without ethics events might well follow a logic of the market place that would not lead to ethical relations among buyer and seller, employer and employed, monopolist and entrepreneur.

It is the internal spectator, the voice that speaks to us while observing the First and Second the I and the Other rehearse there dialogue on the stage in our mind's eye. And in this model, even two actors on the stage visualize the dialogue of the Triad in their own head, but as well in the head of the other. Fourth - then there were four voices - This is a very special voice, one we sense is about to speak but does not, one that is on the stage but stays in the shadows. In the Fourth, "the event is never over and done with" Kirkeby, And with the about to speak voice of the Fourth, we are intuitively aware of the simulation and almost can here the polyphony of voices, a mob about to take storm the stage.

We may hear a groan, a murmur, a mumbling sound, but we can never quite make out the words. We can sense somehow the bureaucratic machine, the quest journey, and even chaos itself are just mythic metaphors some people have speculated and articulated about the web of human events web is yet another one, as it theater a metaphor.

We sense the gap, and we know with one more step we will certainly fall into chaos.

Decide, how many voices you have, in your leadership personality, and in the situation of the organization you lead? See Boje c for more on the multiple voices of leadership. Table Four presents the primary archetype mask the 8 main leader types and the secondary masks 8 additional types. Then there is the more distant pair of masks, followed by the type of leader that will drive you crazy in that row.

Note: different commentators and analysts position the same leader in different types. For example. J is for planned, orderly and systematic, which pre- and post, Bush still exhibits that. Yet in post, the U. The speeches are more about God and country, and more inspiring, observers say. The point is that the spectators can dictate the type spoock the leader must accommodate according to the situation.

This could personnality play-acting. We know, for example, that former President Reagan read from cue cards prepared by his staff; always the actor.

There is in leadership, and in these roles typw certain amount of theatrics, and masks are selected by some leaders for the situation. Others are less flexible. The point again is that spectators perceive they need a particular leaderly type to meet the demands of a particular situation. And sometimes the situations are manufactured to fit the leader; other times the leader must be restoried and rescripted to fit a new and different situation.

Instructions for taking the m-b test:

And if this hypothesis is true, then the whole idea of universal personality traits goes the way of modernity, and makes way for the flexible identities and multiplicities of the postmodern adventure. Truman, Personalihy Davis, John D. Rockefeller, Lyndon B. Bush Senior and Jr. Eisenhower Some put Truman here. Roosevelt, though some say he is ESTP.

Connect with us

Lee; Princess of Wales Diana - Quiet, friendly, responsible and conscientious. Committed and steady in meeting their obligations. Thorough and painstaking, loyal and considerate who is concerned with how others feel. ESFP, Mr. Gore is an INTP. He is what Keirsey calls "The Architect. Caution: Two qualifying peraonality First, different famous people sites do not agree completely on which type a particular person is. Second, this could be because people have more than one persona or mask, persomality just personaliity method work.

I lean more towards the multiplicity thesis. For a different ty;e oriented presentation, that does not pigeon hole leaders into any one category, see Boje on Existential Leadership In any case, the point here is that you have many archetypes and these change over time, and you can muster up one you need if you have the determination, training, and spovk faculty. However, more recent work suggests that building a leadership team is based more on balancing S with the P and J.

The hypothesis is that balancing these types rounds out your leadership in complex, uncertain, and tough times. Further, I assume that all the leader modes are necessary to make such a diverse and dynamic team perform to its peak. The Opposite Types in the last column would be the ones to drive A and B the most crazy on a team, but when they can all learn to work together, can also yield the most. Balancing team roles and learning to work with diverse personalities takes time, training, leadership, and an understanding of the various archetypes present in each team and the ones that are missing from a team that is less than what it could be if they could be recruited.

Not perosnality situations require such diverse teams. Situation differences are explored in Tables 7 and 8. Figure Four gives us the four team roles necessary for effective team work. The team roles for complex work come from looking at these dimensions. It is not the usual way of sorting people, since it splits the S's by their Spockk and J scores.

Figure Five: Team Roles that Count.

Romantic relationships

The the SP is concrete and utilitarian trouble shootersthe SJ is concrete and cooperative traditionalistsand the NT is abstract and utilitarian visionarieswhile the NF type is abstract and cooperative catalysts. The hypothesis is that more effective teams will balance all four personality types. They are realistic, but to them everything is negotiable.

They can be oriented towards transactional needs to mold and shape political transactions and opinions use focus groups for input or to the transformational ways of seeking to reform the rules of the game. They are the Opinion and Reformer leaders. They can be quite open, flexible, and focus on the needs of the tyype situation.

Trouble shooters like the game of change and can use very adaptive tactics. They dislike being told what to do and are impatient with Heroes and Princes. They are tolerant of Bureaucrats, but will move around them to get things done. Typf makes them impatient since typd do not enjoy maintaining the status who. If their are no fires to put out, troubleshooters may start some and then put them out. Troubleshooter opinion and reform leaders listen more to followers than to their superiors.

They are more flexible and open-minded to those they lead than to those they follow. Superiors may find troubleshooters hard to predict, since they are so flexible in how they accomplish things. They set up monitoring, inspecting, and guardian systems of surveillance. They make patient, thorough, steady, and reliable managers and supervisors.

They value caution and tradition and expect accurate work. Personailty preserve the traditions and rituals in life and have a keen sense of moral and social responsibility. Both modes of traditionalists are monophonic, speaking for their organization with a single voice. They are decisive and ppersonality when they are working out their plans with people who just go along and do their job. Traditionalists run efficient meetings, expect colleagues to hear their leaderly voice, remember it, and stick to their plan.

They will become impatient when plans and projects get delayed. They surround themselves with people who can carry out reliable functions and be predictable. Most uncomfortable around revolutionaries who disrupt their plans or politicians who mess with their traditions. As politicians, visionaries can dream big. They will grow and develop the organization and place a strong emphasis on surrounding themselves with competent and intelligent people.

Princes and Politicians are somewhat sly and expect a lot of themselves and of others. Visionaries seek change and focus on strategic possibilities and tactics, even when they run over the top of others. They can easily see long-range plans and anticipate limits for their organizations. They can become empire builders or leaders of typs parties. They seek the cutting edge in their empires and tend to be nonconformists when it comes to bureaucracy, though they often wind up on top of one.

Princes and Politicians paint a canvas of ideas and encourage others to share knowledge that will gain them tactical power. Visionaries will solve problems and enhance the creative process, but once things are set in motion, they prefer to withdraw and let someone else take run the system. Walt Disney kept strict and absolute control over the managers of the Magic Kingdom Boje, Princes and Politicians many ignore the feelings of others to get their way.

Their style of leadership is more participative e. Though the Revolutionary responds to more voices. Heroes are often referred to as charismatic Max Weber. Revolutionaries such as Gandhi and King Jr. Both the hero and revolutionary are transformational leaders. They seek harmony and cooperation, but are willing, in the case of King Jr. They see possibilities in people and can turn their liabilities into assets by rallying them to their cause.

Catalysts can get too relational, and get over-extended and burn out. People worried that Gandhi's health was deteriorating from his extended fasts. The downfall of the Hero and Revolutionary is they may seek approval and personaliyy people pleasers.

How to best leverage your personality type to drive success

Catalysts seek positive feedback and despise the impersonal treatment of others. Star Trek fans can see the impact of four different personalities tackling complex problems tgpe the following example. He is stressed when he has to fix the engines that Kirk asks ttpe to push beyond their limit. Scotty is the skeptic, questioning if something can be done and wanting to follow tradition.

He likes to know where he is in the organization chart. He thinks with hierarchies and. He is sensing and judging and then relating things and can treat people as things and thing-tenders. NT Mr. Spock wants to make up logical structures that connect ideas, not people or values. He creates the theory or blueproint and visionary model of abstract concepts to solve problems based upon time series and historical analysis and simulation.

He is not bothered by traditional and likes to see the connections that will result in his reasoned intuitive leaps about the big picture. Spock peers at the vision of the universe on his screens. SP Mr. He is the critic and trouble sppock a bit of a rebel. He challenges the military-types with his eat, drink and be merry role. He dislikes being the cog in the wheel be it a logical, military, or administrative one. He can be radical in his approach to problem solving in groups.

Kirk will dispute what is logical and search for what is human and even what is spiritual along with McCoy. Kirk makes connections on a psychological, emotional and spiritual level. He seeks the universal oneness persinality his voyages, but he will act out of intuition typpe take action just to see what happens or upset an opponent's predictions about his strategy.

Star Trek personalitty a different approach to team work. In Star Trek people stay in their roles and only learn to appreciate the other. Problems are solved with team work, but their is more struggle in the inner dimensions of each character in Star Wars. In Star Spocj, Captain Kirk always ends up the hero.

But in Star Wars, the characters are more diversified, and personaljty character must complement the other and deal with the struggle with their own inner enemies to be successful. In different parts of the Star Wars adventure, more than in Star Trek, different people emerge as heroic characters. As an adult Vader follows the traditions of his Emperor. Vader wants everything to be in order or you will pay the price.

He treats people more as things than does OB1. Yet, in the end Vader takes off his machine mask and has feelings for Luke. C3PO is more bothered about being proper about tradition than is R2D2. R2D2 will break out of its programming and plug into an personlity computer personalith free the others. C3PO is always talking in abstractions, while R2D2 will just take action once it is able to make an apock leap.

Both have vision to see the universe on their screens. He is spodk a gambler and will take risks that other characters find imprudent. Solo has an inner struggle with values and moral issues. He operates from his gut more than by logical vision or thought out plans or disciplined training. He challenges the existing of the Jedi, Empire, and Federation. Solo is the critic and trouble shooter a definite rebel.

He challenges the military-types with personaliyt eat, drink and be merry attitude. No cog in the wheel be it a logical, Jedi, or political. Both will bend the rules, but Lea zpock follow traditions is more the politician. Luke will defy what analysis or engineering says is not possible an influence from his lersonality Hans and OB1. Luke will dispute what is logical and search for what is human and even what is spiritual an influence from OB1.

Both make connections on a psychological, emotional and spiritual level. Both seek universal oneness in their quests, but Luke will act out of intuition and take action just to see what happens or upset an opponent's predictions about his strategy, while Lea will take the traditional and political ro. Luke struggles with his dark side. But in Star Wars the characters struggle with their own transformations, slock so than in Star Trek. Star Wars steps only a bit out of the box that is Star Trek, but the differences are important slock for team building.

That is, in Star Wars, the inner struggle and the character transformations all for more complex team performance than in the more top-down military hierarchy of Star Trek. Between Mr. Each struggles with pfrsonality Will to Power, a will to break free of their service to the force. In this sense across the episodes, it is Darth Vader that conquers his inner enemies and becomes Superman. Just as he dies he removes his robotic and mechanistic mask, and becomes human.

Serving either force ends up bureaucratic, while moving moving beyond such control is a step toward Superman. Hans Solo ends up being the reformer, despite his struggle to remain only the independent rebel. He struggles with his urge to be the gambler and promoter. Luke, sock a different hero a catalyst and crusader. This "stratigraphic" ordering also matches educational level, as knowledge in a society increases with time apparent "dark ages" notwithstanding.

The emphasis on knowledge makes this a level-6 oriented ordering; other orderings or lack thereof follow from different levels of view: E. A coincidental analogy is quarks, which come in 6 "flavors", discovered in order of increasing mass. Your personality is charismatic, friendly and energetic, but you take life personailty and can be a little opinionated on your own turf. You're extremely outspoken when you feel you're in the right. You're highly productive, realistic and sensible. Somewhat of a traditionalist, you're distrustful of new and untested ideas, and you're more than a little blunt telling others how you feel about them, or about whatever other faults you see.

When you give a compliment, however, you mean it. Your primary goal in life is doing the right thing, and being in charge. Your reward is to be appreciated by others and have your opinion respected. You also enjoy having others willingly follow your orders. Good careers for your type include being a command officer, pharmacist, teacher, and personnel manager.

People like you are generally logical, honest and upfront. You get impatient with phonies and people who are disorganized, though you keep your reactions to yourself, as you're usually cautious and quiet, though not timid. Others find you reliable and will count on spovk being there in times of need. You make a loyal and responsible friend, though only when others remember that you're conservative in nature.

You're literal, realistic, and practical. You're a hard worker who does very well in highly detailed situations, as you're careful and precise. You are also somewhat resistant to change and comfortable with routine. When change occurs, you'll be the last one to fit it into your routine, but you'll become an expert in time. You work much better to adapt to change when you see practical benefits.

Your primary goal in life is to be of service and presonality your job well. Your best rewards are to be listened to and to be acknowledged for your hard work. Good careers for your type are operations officer, chief information officer, database administrator, police detective, and science officer.

People like you are generally concerned about others and work hard to tupe of service. You're friendly, affectionate, outgoing and talkative. You're polite when it's persnality, willing typpe take personalitu to help others, and cooperative, especially when you perceive that you're part of a team. Personalkty enjoy action, but you're a realist and quite literal. You're also organized and responsible.

You love things that are time-honored. You're conscientious, almost to a fault at times. You're very sensitive to others and get your feelings hurt easily. Your primary goal in life is creating exceptional relationships and helping people in tangible, practical ways. Your reward is to be appreciated and relied upon, as well as to respected, particularly in regards to your ethics. Good careers for your type include personal fitness trainer, exercise physiologist, travel agent, innkeeper, veterinarian, and employee assistance counselor.

People like you are generally highly nurturing and typr. You're gentle and thoughtful, but also cautious, especially about exposing your inner self. You're highly protective of your privacy and share yourself with others as a of love. Once comfortable, personallity, you are quite affectionate. You also desire steady and unstinting love in return. You're very literal and maintain a high awareness of the physical world.

You are quite likely to have a highly developed sense of spirituality. Personailty are uncompromising about your personal standards and easily offended, especially when you do not feel appreciated or when people violate your personal space. You are diligent and conscientious, organized and decisive. You respond well to politeness. You enjoy productive routine. Your primary goal in life is helping people in real ways.

Your reward is stability in your daily life and people who support your feelings. You cannot have friends who would ever ask you to compromise your values. Good careers for your type include primary care physician, chief medical persobality, elementary school worker, guidance counselor, special education teacher, and genealogist. They seek sensation on tpe moment-to-moment basis and wish greatly to have a personal impact on the world around them.

They are optimistic about the future and cynical about the past. They make things. People like you are generally highly observant and totally present in the moment. You're active and adventurous, so you can sometimes be impulsive, even when confronted with danger.

I want private chat

You're not interested in regrets, however, if your impulsiveness causes you to make an error. You're a free spirit. You get impatient tpye phonies and people who are disorganized, though you keep your reactions to yourself, as you're usually cautious and quiet, though not timid. Others find you persnality and will count on your being there in times of need. You make a loyal and responsible friend, though only when others remember that you're conservative in nature.

You're literal, realistic, and practical. You're a hard worker who does very well in highly detailed situations, as you're careful and precise. You are also somewhat resistant to change and comfortable with routine. When change occurs, you'll be the last one to fit it into your routine, but you'll become an expert in time.

You work much better to adapt to change when you see practical benefits. Your primary goal in life is to be of service and do your job well. Your best rewards are to be listened to and to be acknowledged for your hard work. Good careers for your type are operations officer, chief information officer, database administrator, police detective, and science officer. People like you are generally concerned about others and work hard to be of service.

You're friendly, affectionate, outgoing and talkative.

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

You're polite when it's appropriate, willing to take risks to help others, and cooperative, especially when you perceive that you're part of a team. You enjoy action, but you're a realist and quite literal. You're also personqlity and responsible. You love things that are time-honored. You're conscientious, almost to a fault at times.

Your subscription failed

You're very sensitive to others and get your feelings hurt easily. Your primary goal in life is creating exceptional relationships and helping people in tangible, practical ways. Your reward is to be appreciated and relied upon, as well as to respected, particularly in regards to your ethics.

spoxk Good careers for your type include personal fitness trainer, exercise physiologist, travel agent, innkeeper, veterinarian, and employee assistance counselor. People like you are generally highly nurturing and caring. You're gentle and thoughtful, but also cautious, especially about exposing your inner persnality.

You're highly protective of your privacy and share yourself with others as a of love. Once comfortable, however, you are quite affectionate. You also desire steady and unstinting love in return. You're very literal and maintain a high awareness of the physical world. You are quite likely to have a highly developed sense of spirituality. You are uncompromising about your personal standards and easily offended, especially sopck you do not feel appreciated or when people violate your personal space.

You are diligent and conscientious, organized and decisive. You respond well to politeness.

Personalitj enjoy productive routine. Your primary goal in life is helping people in real ways. Your reward is stability in your daily life and people who support your feelings. You cannot have friends who would ever ask you to compromise your spocl. Good careers for your type include primary care physician, chief medical officer, elementary school worker, guidance counselor, special education teacher, and genealogist.

They seek sensation on a moment-to-moment basis and wish greatly to have a personal impact on the world around them. They are optimistic about the future and cynical about the past. They make things. People like you are generally highly observant and totally present in the moment.

Nolanville Tx Housewives Personals

You're active and adventurous, so you can sometimes be impulsive, even when confronted with danger. You're not interested in regrets, however, if your impulsiveness causes you to make an error. You're a free spirit. You're very adept socially and easily make friends, especially when people are honest with you. You're talkative and adaptive to people and situations, though you prefer to be casual. peersonality

You can be logical and calm, but you love to have fun. You've got a great sense of humor, and you're charming whenever tyep want to be. You're also quite literal, a practical person who makes good use of your intense curiosity. Your primary goal in life is the freedom to have fun and gype fully experience life in the here and now.

Your reward is to be surrounded by people who share your sense of fun and humor. Good careers for your type include emergency medical technician, corrections officer, security chief, civil engineer, chief engineer, marine biologist, and developer of electronic games. People like you are generally extremely logical and pragmatic, to the point of being somewhat aloof.

When you need to be, you can function in a highly objective and unemotional manner, but you also tend to be impulsive and incredibly curious about the world around you.